TJT2
2015-03-02 05:33:51 UTC
Viimeiset numeroidut Zimmermanit, missä viipyy torppari de Grootin
vastaukset? Tässä on nyt esitetty NELJÄKYMMENTÄ "uusnatsien" argumenttia, ja
P de G aikoinaan lupasi torpata niitä sitä mukaan kun niitä esitetään... No,
katteettomat lupaukset ja tyhjä uho ovat tyypillisiä evolutionistien
piirteitä, joten en ole mitenkään yllättynyt Grootin de kyvyttömyydestä.
Vaan mitäs pitäisi ajatella siitä, että kukaan muu ei ole yrittänytkään
kommentoida näitä asioita?? (Rauno Viljasen mölinöitä ei lasketa).
Vaikeneminenhan on myöntämisen merkki, joten taidatte kaikki olla samaa
mieltä, huijausta koko holocausti... mutta ette uskalla sanoa sitä ääneen,
koska ette uskalla avoimesti olla eri mieltä virallisen totuuden kanssa!?
x x x clip x x x
39. Contesting the alleged "Typhus Myth", Zimmerman objects that "only 2,060
of the 68,864 deaths were from typhus" (p. 5), claiming that the cause of
death which appear on the "death certificates" was very often falsified by
the SS, and Professor Zimmerman concludes:
"How then can they be explained if the stated causes do not conform to
physical reality? The only explanation is that camp authorities were engaged
in a massive killing campaign of registered prisoners" (p. 5).
Well, two facts are incontestable: that at the beginning of July 1942 a
typhus epidemic broke out in Auschwitz, and during that month the mortality
of the prisoners increased enormously. Now if Professor Zimmerman doesn't
want to see a cause and effect connection between these two facts, that's
his business. Of course it's true that some survived the typhus epidemics,
such as Lucie Adelsberger and Ella Lingens Reiner (p. 5), but it's equally
true that the poor devils who were not "Prominent" - even if they survived
that sickness - because of the general prostration of their physique, the
weakening of their immune system, and because of the scarcity of medicinals,
they could easily incur other ailments and died from other causes. In my
opinion this explains the relatively small number of deaths from typhus in
the Sterbebücher of Auschwitz.
Regarding babies that "were said to have died from 'decrepitude' " (p. 5),
it is difficult to believe that doctors were falsifying in this idiotic way.
Grotum and Parcer, the Zimmerman sources, even by making a computerized
analysis of the data contained in the Sterbebücher, indicated one single
case of this kind,[54] and that is reason to believe that this one is the
only one,[55] therefore this most probably deals with an ordinary error
here.
40. One last observation concerning the connection between the deceased and
the coke supplies to the crematories. Zimmerman writes in conclusion of his
analysis of the problem:
"Therefore, the month of the second-highest recorded coke delivery also
corresponds with the month of either the lowest or one of the lowest monthly
death totals of registered prisoners" (p. 23).
This fact, which to Zimmerman appears an implacable contradiction, is
nevertheless perfectly normal, as I explained in point 36. Few cremations
signify major cooling of the oven and major consumption of fuel for
maintaining operating temperature; many cremations signifies instead minor
cooling down of the oven.
For now I am confining myself to these preliminary considerations which
already are sufficient to assess the qualifications, competence, and above
all the polemic honesty of this professor.
The three days I spent on this, thus deterring me from more serious studies,
are also too many.
CARLO MATTOGNO
x x x clop x x x
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/CM/jcz.html
No niin, P de G, tämä lyhyempi vastine on nyt käyty läpi, joko nöyrryt
faktojen edessä, vai alanko käydä läpi sitä pitempää vastinetta!?
vastaukset? Tässä on nyt esitetty NELJÄKYMMENTÄ "uusnatsien" argumenttia, ja
P de G aikoinaan lupasi torpata niitä sitä mukaan kun niitä esitetään... No,
katteettomat lupaukset ja tyhjä uho ovat tyypillisiä evolutionistien
piirteitä, joten en ole mitenkään yllättynyt Grootin de kyvyttömyydestä.
Vaan mitäs pitäisi ajatella siitä, että kukaan muu ei ole yrittänytkään
kommentoida näitä asioita?? (Rauno Viljasen mölinöitä ei lasketa).
Vaikeneminenhan on myöntämisen merkki, joten taidatte kaikki olla samaa
mieltä, huijausta koko holocausti... mutta ette uskalla sanoa sitä ääneen,
koska ette uskalla avoimesti olla eri mieltä virallisen totuuden kanssa!?
x x x clip x x x
39. Contesting the alleged "Typhus Myth", Zimmerman objects that "only 2,060
of the 68,864 deaths were from typhus" (p. 5), claiming that the cause of
death which appear on the "death certificates" was very often falsified by
the SS, and Professor Zimmerman concludes:
"How then can they be explained if the stated causes do not conform to
physical reality? The only explanation is that camp authorities were engaged
in a massive killing campaign of registered prisoners" (p. 5).
Well, two facts are incontestable: that at the beginning of July 1942 a
typhus epidemic broke out in Auschwitz, and during that month the mortality
of the prisoners increased enormously. Now if Professor Zimmerman doesn't
want to see a cause and effect connection between these two facts, that's
his business. Of course it's true that some survived the typhus epidemics,
such as Lucie Adelsberger and Ella Lingens Reiner (p. 5), but it's equally
true that the poor devils who were not "Prominent" - even if they survived
that sickness - because of the general prostration of their physique, the
weakening of their immune system, and because of the scarcity of medicinals,
they could easily incur other ailments and died from other causes. In my
opinion this explains the relatively small number of deaths from typhus in
the Sterbebücher of Auschwitz.
Regarding babies that "were said to have died from 'decrepitude' " (p. 5),
it is difficult to believe that doctors were falsifying in this idiotic way.
Grotum and Parcer, the Zimmerman sources, even by making a computerized
analysis of the data contained in the Sterbebücher, indicated one single
case of this kind,[54] and that is reason to believe that this one is the
only one,[55] therefore this most probably deals with an ordinary error
here.
40. One last observation concerning the connection between the deceased and
the coke supplies to the crematories. Zimmerman writes in conclusion of his
analysis of the problem:
"Therefore, the month of the second-highest recorded coke delivery also
corresponds with the month of either the lowest or one of the lowest monthly
death totals of registered prisoners" (p. 23).
This fact, which to Zimmerman appears an implacable contradiction, is
nevertheless perfectly normal, as I explained in point 36. Few cremations
signify major cooling of the oven and major consumption of fuel for
maintaining operating temperature; many cremations signifies instead minor
cooling down of the oven.
For now I am confining myself to these preliminary considerations which
already are sufficient to assess the qualifications, competence, and above
all the polemic honesty of this professor.
The three days I spent on this, thus deterring me from more serious studies,
are also too many.
CARLO MATTOGNO
x x x clop x x x
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/CM/jcz.html
No niin, P de G, tämä lyhyempi vastine on nyt käyty läpi, joko nöyrryt
faktojen edessä, vai alanko käydä läpi sitä pitempää vastinetta!?
--
--TJT--
Myers had myriads of opportunities to make a fool of himself, and he missed
not a single one of them.
--TJT--
Myers had myriads of opportunities to make a fool of himself, and he missed
not a single one of them.